Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Cramming of Unauthorized Service Charges, Membership Fees, Subscriptions or Payments on Bank Accounts, Credit Cards or Telephone Bills Fraud


Cramming of Unauthorized Service Charges, Membership Fees, Subscriptions or Payments on Bank Accounts, Credit Cards or Telephone Bills Fraud


Cramming, the number one telemarketing scam of 1998, refers to putting unauthorized or nonexistent telecommunication or service charges on your credit card, bank account or phone bill.
Con artists have found the telephone billing and collection system to be a fertile area to defraud consumers. Taking advantage of changes in the telecommunications industry that began years ago with the break up of AT&T, these cons arrange to put charges on consumers' phone bills for services that were never ordered, authorized, received or used.
Sometimes a one-time charge for entertainment services will be crammed onto your phone bill. Other times it may be a recurring monthly charge. Cramming of recurring charges falls into two general categories: club memberships, such as psychic clubs, personal clubs, or travel clubs; and telecommunications products or service programs, such as voice mail, paging, and calling cards.
The charges may just appear on your phone bill as a charge for either a regular long distance or a collect telephone call. People who receive these bills have no way of knowing that the charges are actually for a sex line or psychic line and not long distance or collect calls so they pay without ever realizing.
Automated Phone Number Capture
Anyone capable of capturing a consumer's telephone number can cause charges for a product or service to be included on that person's phone bill. Using Automatic Number Identification (ANI), a system similar to "caller ID," they can capture the phone number from which a call to the party originates. Thus, the only thing needed by scam artists that have ANI is a method of inducing you to call them.
You don't even need to divulge credit card or other account numbers in order to be billed. Similarly, phone numbers can be obtained, without high-tech equipment, through purported sweepstakes that require a phone number on an entry form, or even through simply drawing numbers at random from the telephone directory.
It is not possible for the owner of the telephone line to block telephone number capture through ANI on calls that they themselves or others place from their phones, and it is not possible to prevent others from access to their phone number. The person placing a call or otherwise providing a telephone number may not even be you.
Shortly after the introduction of 900 numbers, this technology was used by unscrupulous operators to deceive and defraud consumers. Once the call was placed, they were billed for the alleged service or information and the unwitting victim often had no means to contest the charge. In many cases, they never even received the promised information or service.
Here are some common ways crooks get your phone number and cram charges onto your bill. You may never get the service —just the bills.
800 Number Calls. You call an 800 number advertised as a free date line, psychic line or other adult entertainment service. A recording prompts you to give your name and to say "I want the service," or some similar phrase, to get the advertised free service. You may have no opportunity to speak with an operator or ask questions, but you are automatically enrolled in a club or service program. The phone number from which you call is captured and billed. You often never get the "free" service you called for, or the service you're billed for.
Sometimes a recorded voice directs you to press one or more specific keys on your phone to be transferred to an adult entertainment or chat line. If you do, you are connected to the service of your choice but the charge for the service then appears on your bill as an international long-distance call.
Contest Entry Forms. You fill out a contest entry form, thinking you're entering to win a prize. In fact, some unscrupulous promoter is using the contest to get your phone number, enroll you for a calling card or some similar service, and bill you on your phone bill. The disclosure on the entry form, which is very difficult to comprehend and in very fine print, says that by completing the form you agree to pay $4.95 a month for the company's services.
Direct Mail Sweepstakes. You receive a sweepstakes promotion in the mail that tells you to dial an 800 number to enter or claim your prize. When you call, a recording follows an automated script to enroll you in a club or service program. The phone number from which you call is captured and billed. Once again, the disclosure on the sweepstakes mailer is very difficult to comprehend; is in very fine print, or is a "negative option" billing, so unless you respond to refuse, they sign you up.
"Instant" Calling Cards. Someone may use your phone to call an 800 number for an adult entertainment service, and be offered an "instant calling card." The "calling card" isn't an actual card, but is rather an access process linked to the phone number from which the call was placed, whether or not they are made from your phone.
Dating Service Calls. You call an 800 number advertised as a way to meet local people for free. You're told your date will call you back, or you're asked to enter a code to be "teleconferenced" with your date. What you're not told is that you'll be charged a hefty fee for your conversation with your date.
International Calls. Some ads for adult entertainment services tell you to call a number starting with 011, 500, or another unfamiliar area code. The ads don't explain that these numbers are for expensive international calls, and that the entertainment provider is making money every minute you stay on the line.
"Free Minutes" Deals. You may see ads promising "free time" for a date line, psychic line, or other adult entertainment service. When you call, you're put on hold but told that you won't be charged for this time. Sometimes, the "hold time" is deducted from your free minutes. In fact, you may be billed for some of your hold time as well as your talk time.

Hurry Up and Call
You get an e-mail, fax or even a call on your pager which says to call this number immediately, there's been an accident or sickness in your family, or outstanding bills you owe are past due, but it turns out to be just a mix-up when you call.
While connected you get a lengthy recorded message or person pretending not to understand what the call is about so as to keep you on the phone longer. You are actually being billed for the call at anywhere from $6.99 - $25 per minute. It pays to ask the operator for the location of any strange number prior to calling.

Cell Phone Spamming Becomes Indirect Cramming
Cell phone users in Tokyo are regularly bombarded with hundreds of unwanted e-mail messages as well as the newest mobile come-on: the one-giri spam scam.
One-giri is Japanese shorthand for computers that dial numbers randomly, ring once and hang up. The callers - usually dating services that phone thousands of numbers randomly - are themselves not charged because no one picks up but the incoming call leaves a phone number on the receiver's handset.
Curious to see who called, unsuspecting Japanese redial and get an offer such as "press 1 if you want to meet a friend, press 2 if ..." which they generally rush to refuse, lest they run up extra charges.
NTT DoCoMo, which runs the market leading i-mode service, processes 950 million cell-phone data messages a day, yet a staggering 85% of them are sent to nonexistent addresses, most by computers that randomly generate numbers and send messages searching for active accounts.

The company, which will spend $8.7 million this year to block unwanted bulk mail from entering its servers, says one-fifth of the 30,000 complaints it received in October were about annoying e-mails.
In addition to suffering bad public relations, the carriers are seeing their network computers overload and the slowing of transmission times as shady programmers continue to develop algorithms sophisticated enough to bypass server walls and create lists of valid addresses that can be resold.

While Japanese cell-phone providers are urging users to change their addresses frequently and to refuse to return calls from unknown numbers, people are still spammed on a regular basis at their own expense.
This digital epidemic will soon spread beyond Japan's shores as DoCoMo is preparing to introduce its i-mode network in Europe.

All the Wrong Places
Looking for companionship you decide to try a service advertised in the newspaper as a "free matching" service with "local singles". You are urged to call a toll-free number. When connected they ask you where you are calling from and what sort of person you want to meet. They tell you that they will have a "local single" return the call, then hang up.
Shortly thereafter, you begin receiving return calls, often many, over the course of several days from the services' employees posing as "local singles." They do not disclose in the first call, or during any of the return calls, that there is to be an amount charged, contrary to the advertising claim that the service is "free".
Nevertheless, when you later receive your phone bill, you are shocked to find exorbitant charges —described as collect or direct calls from a number in Florida, England or some other distant locale —billed to your telephone number at the rate of about $4 per minute. In a number of instances, the bills have reflected two calls allegedly occurring during overlapping periods of time to the same number.
Many people were charged hundreds of dollars on their phone bills for one company's audio entertainment service delivered through return calls. In many cases no initial call to the service was ever made and even those who did call are generally shocked and surprised to find these unexpected and substantial charges on their telephone bills.
They may even provide a toll-free 800 number on your phone bill, ostensibly for you to call with complaints or questions. However, when you call this number you find it difficult to reach a representative.
You may reach only a recorded message telling you that if you need to speak to a representative you will have to try back later because all operators are busy. Or you may be put on hold for long periods of time. In fact, you could easily spend several hours over a period of several days simply trying to reach a person who can answer questions about the charges on your phone bill.
When you finally succeed in reaching them, they tell you that you are legally responsible for the charges, regardless of who, if anyone, ordered and received the service in question.
In many instances, they initially refuse to credit your account, even though you have neither ordered nor authorized an order for their services. In some cases, they will issue a credit to you only after the intervention of your phone company or government authority.

Ordering You Around
You receive an e-mail informing you that your order has been received and processed and your credit card will be billed for charges ranging from $250 to $899. The trouble is, you haven't ordered anything. The e-mail advises you that if you have questions about your "order" or want to speak to a representative you should call a telephone number in area code 767. You don't realize that the area code is for Dominica, West Indies, because no country code is required to make the call.
You call expecting to speak to a representative about the erroneous "order" but are connected to an adult entertainment audiotext service with sexual content. Later, you receive telephone charges for the international, long-distance call.
Callers to one number are led to believe they are talking to a live person, but in fact it is a clever recording that responds to the caller's voice. Among other things, an irate-sounding man with a British accent warns, "Your check will come round or we'll come round to get it." The recording seems designed to keep callers on the line as long as possible, and is reportedly billed at $25 per minute.
Others reported that this "man" with a British accent kept telling them to hold on while he picked up other phone calls and supposedly yelled at his staff. He continued to yell at the callers as well, saying "send the money," and yelled into other ringing phones as long as the callers remained on the line.
"This scam used low-down tactics and high-tech tools to rob consumers in their own homes," said Jodie Bernstein, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection.
They contacted people using bulk e-mail —commonly known as spam —using inactive return addresses which prevented you from refuting the orders by e-mail.
Note: A viewer has indicated that this particular scam event is actually an urban myth that never really occurred, except in the mind of the initial storyteller. Should anyone wish to dispute this claim please write so that it is not unintentionally perpetuated.

How to Avoid Telephone Service Fraud

How to Avoid Telephone Service Fraud
Monthly telephone bills must contain full and accurate descriptions of all charges and clear
identification of each company responsible for those charges. If you have been "slammed"
or "crammed," these charges can often be found on your phone bill.
Slamming
from one company to another without a customer's consent.
What is Slamming? Slamming is switching a customer's service (usually long distance)
month. Are the charges listed from your designated long distance company?
How to Spot Slamming. Carefully review your long distance service charges each
do the following:
If You Have Been Slammed. If your service has been switched without your consent,
them the name of the company that slammed you.
Call your local company and explain you will not pay the disputed charges. Give
Call the long-distance company you had been using to re-establish service.
Cancel service with the carrier that slammed you.
Division
File a complaint with the WUTC or the Attorney General’s Consumer Protection
Cramming
your monthly phone bill. Generally, they are for services you did not order.
What is Cramming? Cramming is unauthorized, misleading, or deceptive charges on
local phone bill may contain charges from multiple companies. Review every itemized
charge and make sure you recognize and have authorized each charge.
How to Spot Cramming. These unauthorized charges can be hard to spot because your
have been crammed:
If You Suspect You Have Been Crammed. Take the following action if you believe you
Call your local phone company and ask for an explanation of the charge.
complain. If the customer service representative cannot resolve the problem, ask to
speak with a supervisor.
If you are convinced you have been crammed, call the company charging you and
Resolving disputes
Be prepared.
documents and information related to the problem.
Research any questionable charge or billing error immediately. Gather all
Record Everything!
Include the date, company name, the person you spoke with, and an explanation of what
was said. This information will help if you need to file a complaint beyond the billing
company.
Note the details of each attempt you make to resolve your dispute.
Notify the Company First.
company responsible for the charge.
Speak with the customer service representative and go over the charges you are disputing.
If the charge is in error, request an adjustment on your bill.
If you cannot resolve the problem with the customer service representative, ask to speak
with a supervisor.
Attempt to get an explanation and a resolution with the
If the Company Does Not Resolve the Problem.
www.wutc.wa.gov, or the Attorney General’s Consumer Protection Division at
4636
Contact the WUTC at 800-562-6150 or800-551-or www.atg.wa.gov/consumer/Bill Collins 1

Massive Fraudulent Collect Call Billing Scheme Halted

Massive Fraudulent Collect Call Billing Scheme Halted

At the request of the Federal Trade Commission, a federal judge has halted a massive fraudulent billing scheme that has collected more than $25 million in bogus collect call charges from hundreds of thousands of consumers. The FTC charged three companies and their principals with deceptive and unfair billing practices for "cramming" -- the unauthorized billing of charges on phone bills -- since at least January 2004.

"Charging consumers for bogus collect calls is stealing," said Lydia Parnes, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection." The Federal Trade Commission will not tolerate crooks who cram unauthorized charges onto phone bills."

The FTC's complaint alleges that, in many instances, the defendants initiated phony collect call charges, such as calls to telephone lines that were dedicated to computers and fax machines, and to phones where no one was present. In addition, some consumers'caller ID logs had no record of collect calls for which they were billed.

The FTC charged the defendants with violating Section 5 of the FTC Act by representing that consumers owed money they did not owe, and by causing consumers to be billed for collect phone calls they neither received nor authorized. According to the FTC's complaint, the defendants claimed that they submitted charges for billing on consumers' bills on behalf of long distance service providers, although the defendants have few, if any, long distance carriers as clients. The defendants' charges typically were buried on the last page of consumers'phone bills, with each charge typically in the range of $5 to $8.

On February 27, Senior Judge Kenneth Ryskamp ordered an ex parte temporary restraining order freezing the assets of Nationwide Communications Inc., Access One Communications Inc., Network One Services Inc., and their principals, Willoughby Farr, Mary Lou Farr, Yaret Garcia, Erika Riaboukha, and Qaadir Kaid. The order appointed a temporary receiver over them and banned them from engaging in unauthorized billing.

On March 8, the court found that the defendants engaged in the widespread unauthorized billing of collect calls in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act and entered a preliminary injunction order prohibiting them from billing or submitting any charge for billing on a consumer's telephone bill. The order continued the asset freeze over them and appointed a permanent receiver over Nationwide Communications, Access One Communications, Network One Services, and certain affiliated entities. The FTC ultimately seeks to permanently bar the defendants from further violations, make them forfeit their ill-gotten gains, and make them pay restitution to consumers. The Commission approved the filing of the complaint in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida by a 5-0 vote.

NOTE: The Commission authorizes the filing of a complaint when it has 'reason to believe' that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The complaint is not a finding or ruling that the defendant has actually violated the law. The case will be decided by the court.

Related documents:

Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff,
vs.
Nationwide Connections, Inc., Access One Communications, Inc., Network One Services, Inc. Willoughby Farr, Mary Lou Farr, Yaret Garcia, Erika Riaboukha, Qaadir Kaid, Defendants


What To Do If You Get Unauthorized Charges On Your Phone Bill

Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, vs. Nationwide Connections, Inc., Access One Communications, Inc., Network One Services, Inc. Willoughby Farr, Mary Lou Farr, Yaret Garcia, Erika Riaboukha, Qaadir Kaid, Defendants

Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, vs. Nationwide Connections, Inc., Access One Communications, Inc., Network One Services, Inc. Willoughby Farr, Mary Lou Farr, Yaret Garcia, Erika Riaboukha, Qaadir Kaid, Defendants
(United States District Court Southern District of Florida)

Civil Action No.: 06-80180
FTC File Nos.: 052 3141; X060028

April 14, 2008

March 13, 2008

March 5, 2008

October 25, 2007

October 10, 2006

September 25, 2006

March 15, 2006

Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Tell the FCC: Crack down on ‘cramming’

Tell the FCC: Crack down on ‘cramming’
 The “cramming” scam costs phone customers an estimated $2 billion a year. Have you ever found strange third-party charges “crammed” on your phone bill for services you never ordered?

Even more maddening, the Chicago Sun-Times reports that phone companies get a cut of this third-party revenue, so there’s little incentive to stop the scam.

Now it’s time to fight back. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) wants to know if it should issue tougher rules to stop cramming on landline and wireless bills.

Today, help stop the fraud! Tell the FCC to issue tougher rules on cramming, and tell your friends to do the same.

FEDERAL JUDGE HALTS FRAUDULENT BILLING SCHEME


FEDERAL JUDGE HALTS FRAUDULENT BILLING SCHEME
Publication: US Fed News Service, Including US State News
Date: Wednesday, March 15 2006
You are viewing page 1
The Federal Trade Commission issued the following press release:
At the request of the Federal Trade Commission, a federal judge has halted a massive fraudulent billing scheme that has collected more than $25 million in bogus collect call charges from hundreds of thousands of consumers. The FTC charged three companies and their principals with deceptive and unfair billing practices for "cramming"

- the unauthorized billing of charges on phone bills - since at least January 2004.
"Charging consumers for bogus collect calls is stealing," said Lydia Parnes, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection." The Federal Trade Commission will not tolerate crooks who cram unauthorized charges onto phone bills."
The FTC's complaint alleges that, in many instances, the defendants initiated phony collect call charges, such as calls to telephone lines that were dedicated to computers and fax machines, and to phones where no one was present. In addition, some consumers' caller ID logs had no record of collect calls for which they were billed.
The FTC charged the defendants with violating Section 5 of the FTC Act by representing that consumers owed money they did not owe, and by causing consumers to be billed for collect phone calls they neither received nor authorized. According to the FTC's complaint, the defendants claimed that they submitted charges for billing on consumers'bills on behalf of long distance service providers, although the defendants have few, if any, long distance carriers as clients. The defendants' charges typically were buried on the last page of consumers'phone bills, with each charge typically in the range of $5 to $8.
On February 27, Senior Judge Kenneth Ryskamp ordered an ex parte temporary restraining order freezing the assets of Nationwide Communications Inc., Access One Communications Inc., Network One Services Inc., and their principals, Willoughby Farr, Mary Lou Farr, Yaret Garcia, Erika Riaboukha, and Qaadir Kaid. The order appointed a temporary receiver over them and banned them from engaging in unauthorized billing.
On March 8, the court found that the defendants engaged in the widespread unauthorized billing of collect calls in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act and entered a preliminary injunction order prohibiting them from billing or submitting any charge for billing on a consumer's telephone bill. The order continued the asset freeze over them and appointed a permanent receiver over Nationwide Communications, Access One Communications, Network One Services, and certain affiliated entities. The FTC ultimately seeks to permanently bar the defendants from further violations, make them forfeit their ill-gotten gains, and make them pay restitution to consumers. The Commission approved the filing of the complaint in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida by a 5-0 vote.
NOTE: The Commission authorizes the filing of a complaint when it has 'reason to believe' that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The complaint is not a finding or ruling that the defendant has actually violated the law. The case will be decided by the court.
Copies (see at http://www.ftc.gov/os/2006/03/index.htm#15 )of the complaint are available from the FTC's Web site at http://www.ftc.gov and from the FTC's Consumer Response Center, Room 130,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580
. The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices in the marketplace and to provide information on 150 consumer topics, call toll-free, 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357), or use the complaint form at http://www.ftc.gov. The FTC enters Internet, telemarketing, identity theft, and other fraud-related complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database help consumers spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish (bilingual counselors are available to take complaints), or to get free information on any of available to hundreds of civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad.
Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, vs. Nationwide Connections, Inc., Access One Communications, Inc., Network One Services, Inc. Willoughby Farr, Mary Lou Farr, Yaret Garcia, Erika Riaboukha, Qaadir Kaid, Defendants; .(http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0523141/0523141.htm) United States District Court Southern District of Florida Civil Action No.: 06-80180; FTC File No.: 052 3141
CONSUMER INFORMATION:
What To Do If You Get Unauthorized Charges On Your Phone Bill(http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/services/cramming.htm) Contact YJ Draiman 818-366-6999

Monday, July 25, 2011

Added charges on phone, utility bills baffle consumers


Added charges on phone, utility bills baffle consumers

by Melissa Burden | The Flint Journal
Saturday May 03, 10:40 PM
Yvonne M. Martin, of Flint, found an old phone bill she paid to Michigan Bell Telephone Company in October 1965 that was $5.53 total and included just taxes in addition to a local service fee. On her current phone bills, she pays all kinds of charges in addition to the local service such as linebacker maintenance, long distance fee, call waiting, federal access charges, 911 billings, federal universal service fee etc. Her bills now cost between $80-$85 a month and she says there are too many fees.

Look around and you're sure to find them:

More information
Where you can learn more about what charges/fees are on your bills and why.
Michigan Public Service Commission: This agency regulates natural gas, electricity and phone service in Michigan. Find consumer alerts, explanations of utility charges and fees and news releases at www.michigan.gov/mpsc.
Federal Communications Commission: The FCC regulates wireless companies and oversees some common charges found on telephones and wireless bills. Details: www.fcc.gov.
Your utility, cellphone, cable, satellite and/or telephone provider: Check Web sites for an explanation of charges, to review your bills or to call toll-free numbers listed on your bills to ask questions about charges.

Fees. Surcharges. Taxes.
Your phone bill has them; same for your cellphone bill. And if you comb your other utility bills, you'll likely find 'em.
And they all add up.
It wasn't always like this. Just ask Yvonne M. Martin of Flint Township, who recently found a Michigan Bell Telephone Co. bill from 1965 while going through some papers.
The bill: $5.53.
In her bill paid Oct. 1, 1965, local service was $4.85 for a month. Add to that a state tax of 19 cents and federal tax of 49 cents to get her total.
"This is just too hilarious compared to what we're doing now," Martin, 68, said.
She now pays about $80 a month for her residential AT&T phone service.
Today's phone bill from AT&T is a lot more complex.
There's the federal access charge, 911 emergency system billing, 911 operational assessment billing and federal universal service fee.
Yvonne M. Martin, of Flint, found an old phone bill she paid to Michigan Bell Telephone Company in October 1965 that was $5.53 total.

With two lines (one's for dial-up computer access only), Martin paid $17 during a recent month on the above fees, plus $4.38 in federal and state taxes.
Plus, of course, the charges for a local calling plan, call waiting, line maintenance protection and long-distance charges.
"It's just so unbelievable," Martin, a retired sales representative for Blue Cross Blue Shield, said of her phone bill now vs. then.
"They break it all down now for everything," she added. "Back then, there wasn't all those additional charges."
Martin said she likes the breakdown of her bill but just doesn't like paying all the additional charges.
And consumers such as Martin really have no choice but to pay the pass-along fees from companies. Cutting back on service to lower bills might help some, but for the most part, these charges and fees are here to stay.
Get ready for more changes coming to AT&T bills and cellphone bills effective July 1.
Bills for land-line telephones will get some relief, but owners of cellphones will see a new charge.
The 911 operational assessment fee will drop in Genesee County from $2.40 to $1.24 per land line, but cellphone users and those who use other communication devices, such as VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol), will begin to pay the fee for the first time, said Judy Palnau, a spokeswoman for the Michigan Public Service Commission.
The change will spread the cost of the surcharge to all phone users.
But Verizon Wireless, which has 65 million customers, is concerned about the added cost to its customers who have multiple cellphones in their plans.
"Families that have three, four, five phone are (paying a) disproportionate amount of fees," said Mike McDermott, executive director of public policy for Verizon's Midwest area.
Verizon breaks down its surcharges for the universal service charge, a regulatory charge and an administrative charge, and taxes in separate areas of its bill and includes a synopsis of the surcharges on its bills.
"It's not a revenue-generating exercise," McDermott said of the surcharges, which offset the company's cost for certain things, such as administration fees and new tower siting.
Cellphone users in Michigan will see a 10-cent relief on their monthly bills beginning in July. A 911 charge for cellphones will drop from 29 cents to 19 cents, Palnau said, but that 19-cent monthly fee now will be added to other wireless devices such as VoIP.
And, added charges affect more than phone bills.
Randy Chamberlain, 52, of Holly, said he's had a hard time understanding all the charges on his Consumers Energy bill. He said charges and taxes add another 15 percent to 20 percent to many of his utility bills.
"It just seems like the taxes are never-ending," he said. "There's tax after tax after tax. The same thing with the satellite bills and such."
Chamberlain said utilities and service providers should explain what the charges are for and why on the bills.
"They're totally unnecessary," he said. "I just think it's a way for the power company to scam the people."
Palnau said it's smart for consumers to monitor their bills.
"It's important that people understand the various parts of their bill," she said.
She suggested using the Internet, including the Public Service Commission's Web site, www.michigan.gov/mpsc, to learn more.
And, for that, at least, there is no fee.

What are all these phone charges?Federal universal service fee: A federal charge to make phone service affordable and available to all, including the low income, in areas where the cost to provide service is high and to aid rural health care providers, libraries and schools with telecommunications and/or Internet accessibility. Traditional phone carriers, wireless carriers and Voice over Internet Protocol company providers such as Vonage are required by Congress to contribute to this fund and, while not required by the government, may pass on the cost to consumers. AT&T currently charges 60 cents per month to its customers.
Federal access charge: Administered by the Federal Communications Commission, this charge covers a portion of the cost to operate and maintain a local phone network. The maximum price a phone company can charge for this is capped by the FCC. AT&T charges its customers $5.37 per month.
911 technical charge: In Michigan, this currently is 21 cents per month for land lines and goes to the telephone company to handle 911 billing. AT&T says this helps cover the costs of customer notification, maintenance and equipment.
911 operational assessment charge: This charge currently is $2.40 a month for land lines in Genesee County and will drop to $1.24 per land line effective July 1, 2008. Cellphones and other devices such as Voice over Internet Protocol also will begin paying the charge effective July 1. The charge is collected and sent back to the local county to pay for 911 operations. This charge varies by county, and some don't charge one at all because their 911 funding is covered in other ways such as through a millage.
Sources: Michigan Public Service Commission, AT&T and Verizon Wireless